A blog for those interested in identifying vintage Hinton Hunt 20 mm wargames figures.
Where possible identification photos will be of unpainted figures.
Wasn't that figure wierd. Why did Hinton make an elite light infantryman and not make a carabinier or chasseur?? What figure was supposed to be used for light infantry? If the ordinary line inbfantry are used (have some so used) then it looks odd to have the elite in different trousers and gaiters. If one uses the Hessian infantry then that has a sabre briquet, but wrong helmet plate and they are in over trousers too. Its So problematic. Minifigs made a suitable figure for the centre companies and I have a couple of battalions of them. I ponder whether a middle gfuard chasseur might do, but wrong helmet plate and wrong badge on the cartridge case again, but at least right leg wear.
Its a problem, because the light infantry regts were extensively used in the field and most divisions have one.
Of course the Colpack is not particularly typical either. Its also odd. This chap has an extra position (kneeling) and obviously some trouble went into making him. I just wonder why?
Roy, isn't the kneling guy FN 85? It's the kneeling rifleman that was more of a surprise to me - I don't remember seeing one, though the reference photograph of one elsewhere here suggests I have at least one of them - maybe just not lots.
Its always funny though what people choose to make and how this is often reflected across loads of ranges - the fact that British infantry are almost always in Belgics, not Stovepipes (giving you 3 years use instead of 12 or so), light dragoons are in shakos not Tarletons, and dragoons in helmets not bicornes. Even when there were these figures (all had Hinton Hunt figures) yoou very rarely if ever come across them, instead you are swamped with Old Guard Grenadiers, riflemen (even pre-Sharpe), and Scots Greys.
I think the original ranges were for for Waterloo and may even have been inspired by the Pericoli film with Steiger as Napoleon and Plummer as the Duke. I think that explains the period of the one piece castings which came first. After that it was the Leipzig armies, Russians and Austrians to fight the French and then the peninsula which is why Tarleton Light Dragoons and bicorne heavies are separate rider figures as are the KGL Hussars. Hinton began remaking figures as separate riders so there are two types of French cuirassier, Brit light dragioon in shako, heavy dragoons in helmet etc. I suspect that Marcus H responded to suggestions from his 'chums' so we got sailors and marines and French in bicornes and Brits in Stovepipe. The bicorne/ stovepipes are probably for Maida in 1805 as the Brits have pigtails and breeches/ gaiters and so are really wrong for the peninsula in 1809-12. But hey who's picky!!
I welcome comments on this blog and on the posts in it. All comments are moderated (so I have to approve them before they appear here). I receive notification of comments once you have made them.
If you want to contact me to send photos etc you can e-mail me HERE
King Darius on his portable throne
Searching
For the Napoleonic range there are now four main ways to search this blog for the figure you are looking for.
If you can read the first part of the code number of a figure, you can search using codes.
If you know or think you know the nationality of the figure, you can search by nation.
If you are looking for a foot figure (infantry or artillery), you can search by pose.
If you are looking for a mounted figure, you can search by type.
For smaller ranges (American Civil War and Medieval) there is a simpler search - by range (ACW or Medieval) and then by foot, mounted or artillery figures.
There have been a number of people who have been an inspiration in pursuing this hobby and getting this project off the ground.
I couldn't have got started properly myself without the Vintage 20 mil site created by Richard and Harry .
Pierre Omidyar invented e-bay in 1995 and so has been responsible for my haemorrhaging money for the last few years.
I would like to thank fellow e-bay buyers who have made prices for Hinton Hunt items so high on e-bay that I have mainly stopped haemorrhaging money and am very tempted to start selling instead of buying.
A group of fellow collectors and enthusiasts have offered help, support, comments, figures, words of wisdom, or even sold me figures - among them Alan, Dick, Harry, Ian, Iain, Jim, John, Peter, Tony, Uwe and Will. If I have missed you off you know who you are (and I have obviously forgotten).
Thanks to those who have joined in the joint purchase of a number of large collections and who have passed on the opportunities for these.
And not really for this blog, thanks to those who are buying up the moulds for a number of lovely old 20mm ranges (other than Hinton Hunt) and will be bringing them into production soon.
3 comments:
Wasn't that figure wierd. Why did Hinton make an elite light infantryman and not make a carabinier or chasseur?? What figure was supposed to be used for light infantry? If the ordinary line inbfantry are used (have some so used) then it looks odd to have the elite in different trousers and gaiters. If one uses the Hessian infantry then that has a sabre briquet, but wrong helmet plate and they are in over trousers too. Its So problematic.
Minifigs made a suitable figure for the centre companies and I have a couple of battalions of them. I ponder whether a middle gfuard chasseur might do, but wrong helmet plate and wrong badge on the cartridge case again, but at least right leg wear.
Its a problem, because the light infantry regts were extensively used in the field and most divisions have one.
Of course the Colpack is not particularly typical either.
Its also odd. This chap has an extra position (kneeling) and obviously some trouble went into making him. I just wonder why?
Best
Roy
Roy, isn't the kneling guy FN 85? It's the kneeling rifleman that was more of a surprise to me - I don't remember seeing one, though the reference photograph of one elsewhere here suggests I have at least one of them - maybe just not lots.
Its always funny though what people choose to make and how this is often reflected across loads of ranges - the fact that British infantry are almost always in Belgics, not Stovepipes (giving you 3 years use instead of 12 or so), light dragoons are in shakos not Tarletons, and dragoons in helmets not bicornes. Even when there were these figures (all had Hinton Hunt figures) yoou very rarely if ever come across them, instead you are swamped with Old Guard Grenadiers, riflemen (even pre-Sharpe), and Scots Greys.
Clive
I think the original ranges were for for Waterloo and may even have been inspired by the Pericoli film with Steiger as Napoleon and Plummer as the Duke. I think that explains the period of the one piece castings which came first. After that it was the Leipzig armies, Russians and Austrians to fight the French and then the peninsula which is why Tarleton Light Dragoons and bicorne heavies are separate rider figures as are the KGL Hussars. Hinton began remaking figures as separate riders so there are two types of French cuirassier, Brit light dragioon in shako, heavy dragoons in helmet etc. I suspect that Marcus H responded to suggestions from his 'chums' so we got sailors and marines and French in bicornes and Brits in Stovepipe. The bicorne/ stovepipes are probably for Maida in 1805 as the Brits have pigtails and breeches/ gaiters and so are really wrong for the peninsula in 1809-12. But hey who's picky!!
Roy
Post a Comment